考研

首页 >考研 > 备考资料 > 考研专业课 > 西医 >

2017年考研英语一阅读理解Text4试题解析

2017-08-28 14:05:24
  2018考研交流群 5862545852018考研交流群

  以下是中公考研小编为大家整理了2017年考研英语一阅读理解Text4试题解析,以供广大考生参考,希望对你们有所帮助。

  Text 4

  In a rare unanimous ruling, the US Supreme Court has overturned the corruption conviction of a former Virginia governor, Robert McDonnell. But it did so while holding its nose at the ethics of his conduct, which included accepting gifts such as a Rolex watch and a Ferrari Automobile from a company seeking access to government.

  The high court’s decision said the judge in Mr. McDonnell’s trail failed to tell a jury that it must look only at his “official acts,” or the former governor’s decisions on “specific” and “unsettled” issues related to his duties.

  Merely helping a gift-giver gain access to other officials, unless done with clear intent to pressure those officials, is not corruption, the justices found.

  The court did suggest that accepting favors in return for opening doors is “distasteful” and “nasty.” But under anti-bribery laws, proof must be made of concrete benefits, such as approval of a contract or regulation. Simply arranging a meeting, making a phone call, or hosting an event is not an “official act.”

  The court’s ruling is legally sound in defining a kind of favoritism that is not criminal. Elected leaders must be allowed to help supporters deal with bureaucratic problems without fear of prosecution of bribery. “The basic compact underlying representative government,” wrote Chief Justice John Roberts for the court, “assumes that public officials will hear from their constituents and act on their concerns.”

  But the ruling reinforces the need for citizens and their elected representatives, not the courts, to ensure equality of access to government. Officials must not be allowed to play favorites in providing information or in arranging meetings simply because an individual or group provides a campaign donation or a personal gift. This type of integrity requires will-enforced laws in government transparency, such as records of official meetings, rules on lobbying, and information about each elected leader’s source of wealth.

  Favoritism in official access can fan public perceptions of corruption. But it is not always corruption. Rather officials must avoid double standards, or different types of access for average people and the wealthy. If connections can be bought, a basic premise of democratic society – that all are equal in treatment by government- is undermined. Good government rests on an understanding of the inherent worth of each individual.

  The court’s ruling is a step forward in the struggle against both corruption and official favoritism.

  36. The underlined sentence(Para.1) most probably shows that the court

  [A] avoided defining the extent of McDonnell’s duties.

  [B] made no compromise in convicting McDonnell.

  [C] was contemptuous of McDonnell’s conduct.

  [D] refused to comment on McDonnell’s ethics.

  37. According to Paragraph 4, an official act is deemed corruptive only if it involves

  [A] concrete returns for gift-givers.

  [B] sizable gains in the form of gifts.

  [C] leaking secrets intentionally.

  [D] breaking contracts officially.

  38. The court’s ruling is d on the assumption that public officials are

  [A] allowed to focus on the concerns of their supporters.

  [B] qualified to deal independently with bureaucratic issues.

  [C] justified in addressing the needs of their constituents.

  [D] exempt from conviction on the charge of favoritism.

  39. Well-enforced laws in government transparency are needed to

  [A] awaken the conscience of officials.

  [B] guarantee fair play in official access.

  [C] allow for certain kinds of lobbying.

  [D] inspire hopes in average people.

  40. The author’s attitude toward the court’s ruling is

  [A] sarcastic.

  [B] tolerant.

  [C] skeptical.

  [D] supportive.

  答案:36-40 CBABD

  36. 答案【C】was contemptuous of McDonnell’s conduct.

  解析:根据题干中的关键词The underlined sentence (para. 1),可以快速的回到原文精 确定位到第一段的划线句子,But it did so while holding its nose at the ethics of his conduct, which included accepting gifts such as a Rolex watch and a Ferrari Automobile from a company seeking access to government. 联系文章第一句话,虽然 法院没有判定Robert McDonnell受贿罪,但是 holding its nose at the ethics of his conduct, 即,在道德上却对他的行为嗤之以鼻。由此可以锁定C选项中的 was contemptuous of 法院其实非常轻视Robert McDonnell的行为。文章的D选项中出现 ethics,原文中相同的词,可能会混淆考生的思维,但是,此句话说的是拒绝从道德的标准评论Robert McDonnell的行为。

  37. 答案【B】sizable gains in the form of gifts.

  解析:根据题干中给出的信息,可知这一题是对文章第四段理解,由第四段推理出正确答案。从第四段But under anti-bribery laws, proof must be made of concrete benefits, such as approval of a contract or regulation. Simply arranging a meeting, making a phone call, or hosting an event is not an “official act.”可以知道,对腐败的定义是,只有受贿者给予了行贿者实际的好处,例如 a contract or regulation, 如果提供的不是具体的好处,仅仅只是:arranging a meeting, making a phone call, or hosting an event, 那么这种行为就不是受贿。由此可以得出答案为A.

  38. 答案【A】allowed to focus on the concerns of their supporters.

  解析:根据题干中的关键词The court’s ruling is don the assumption可以锁定文章的第五段,“The basic compact underlying representative government,” wrote Chief Justice John Roberts for the court, “assumes that public officials will hear from their constituents and act on their concerns.”可以知道,法院的裁定是建立听取其选民的意见,按照他们的利益行事。所以原文中的constituents对应A选项的 supporters,支持者。所以答案选择A

  39. 答案【B】guarantee fair play in official access.

  解析:根据题干中的关键词Well-enforced laws in government transparency可以锁定文章的第六段This type of integrity requires will-enforced laws in government transparency, such as records of official meetings, rules on lobbying, and information about each elected leader’s source of wealth.但是从这句话中找不到所需的信息,从this type of可以知道这句话与前面的句子联系紧,因而可以追溯到这一段的第一句话,But the ruling reinforces the need for citizens and their elected representatives, not the courts, to ensure equality of access to government. 执法力度需要加强市民及其当选代表,而不是法院获得接近政府的平等的机会。equality与B选项的fair play相对应,因此选B.

  40. 答案【D】supportive.

  解析:本题考察的是态度题,从文中后一句话: The court’s ruling is a step forward in the struggle against both corruption and official favoritism.可以看出作者认为法院的裁定是进步的: a step forward,,因此可以看出作者对此的态度是supportive. sarcastic: 尖酸的,挖苦的;tolerant:宽容的,容忍的;skeptical:怀疑的。

  以上是中公考研为大家准备整理的“2017年考研英语一阅读理解Text4试题解析”的相关内容。了解更多相关资讯,敬请关注中公考研。另外,为了帮助考生更好地复习,中公考研为广大学子推出2018考研秋季集训营一对一课程推免课程系列备考专题,针对每一个科目要点进行深入的指导分析,还会根据每年的考研大纲进行针对性的分析哦~欢迎各位考生了 解咨询。同时,中公考研一直为大家推出考研直播课堂,足不出户就可以边听课边学习,为大家的考研梦想助力!

  相关推荐:

  2018考研报考:中医综合专业课试卷内容与题型结构

  2017年考研政治试题及答案

  2017年考研英语一题及答案

  2017年考研英语二题及答案

  2016年西医考研试题及答案

  精华推荐:

西医综合的25个频考点 解析医学类专业的就业前景 20所医学院考研难度分析
医学门类院校排行榜 9年试题超精长难句汇总 英语阅读细节题解题秘籍
西医综合考研考试介绍 考研政治试题及答案 医学专业介绍及院校排名(汇总)
《马原》部分复习方法 考研英语一题及答案 西医综合考研复习日程表

欢迎关注(中公教育考研频道)
及时掌握考研信息

微信咨询 回复“2021”领取备考大礼包
THE END  

声明:本站点发布的来源标注为“中公教育”的文章,版权均属中公教育所有,未经允许不得转载。

如果对你有帮助的话,就点个赞吧!

 猜你喜欢换一换  

 直播课堂

22考研-复试综合面试备考指导讲座

山东22考研-复试综合面试备考指导讲座

考研 |02-25 07:00

免费
2022年陕西公务员考试-百日冲刺迎省考

陕西中公陪你等公告-公告将出!历年的高竞争岗位分析

省考 |02-19 07:00

免费
2022省考周三学常识(直播版)

陕西中公陪你等公告-公告将出!历年的高竞争岗位分析

省考 |02-19 07:00

免费
2022陕西省考——行之有效,1课堂(直播版)

陕西中公陪你等公告-公告将出!历年的高竞争岗位分析

省考 |02-19 07:00

免费

 图书教材去APP查看更多图书

备考工具
退出

考研<

进入频道首页

考研信息

招生简章 考研政策 考试指南 就业信息 考试动态 招生目录 考研院校 考研大纲 参考书目 报录比 成绩查询入口 考研复试 分数线 考研调剂 录取通知书 推免生

备考资料

考研数学 考研政治 考研英语 联考综合 考研专业课 考研专硕 考研常识 复试资料 备考手册

考试题库

考研数学 考研政治 考研英语 联考综合

企业新闻

最新活动

热门话题

精彩专题

各项目入口一键直达<

国家公务员

地方公务员

北京公务员

山东公务员

浙江公务员

江苏公务员

湖南公务员

辽宁公务员

吉林公务员

黑龙江公务员

上海公务员

四川公务员

广东公务员

天津公务员

云南公务员

湖北公务员

河南公务员

福建公务员

安徽公务员

河北公务员

重庆公务员

江西公务员

陕西公务员

贵州公务员

青海公务员

内蒙古公务员

宁夏公务员

新疆公务员

广西公务员

甘肃公务员

山西公务员

海南公务员

西藏公务员

事业单位招聘

公选/遴选考试

大学生村官

军人考试

教师考试

警法考试

选调生

三支一扶

农村信用社

申论热点

银行考试

医学考试

会计考试

在职硕士

医疗卫生招聘

社区工作者

考研

中公新闻

时事政治

行测

面试

申论

公益性岗位

国企招聘

乡镇公务员

防诈骗技巧

公基常识

一级消防工程师

投资者关系网站

公考问答

社会工作师

四六级

法考

软考

PMP

建设工程

IT培训

外语培训