考研

首页 >考研 > 备考资料 > 考研英语 > 阅读 >

2018考研英语阅读须精读的4篇试题阅读

中公考研 2017-09-26 15:53:53

  2018考研交流群 562380027 加入QQ群

  考研英语阅读分值占比大,下面一起来看看2018考研英语阅读须精读的4篇试题阅读,供大家参考。

  考研英语试题一定要好好研究,对于阅读这个重头戏,要拿分,试题更是要研究透了,精读2010年text1(中心的提出;长难句);2010text4(文章结构分析,结合第3题);2011text4(作者态度标新立异,结合2题3题);2012年text3(如何处理生僻概念)。其中规律在近5年里考得非常凶猛,务多总结。下面小编把这几篇调出来整理下,方便大家精读。

  2010年英语一试题Text 1

  Of all the changes that have taken place in English-language newspapers during the past quarter-century, perhaps the most far-reaching has been the inexorable decline in the scope and seriousness of their arts coverage.

  It is difficult to the point of impossibility for the average reader under the age of forty to imagine a time when high-quality arts criticism could be found in most big-city newspapers. Yet a considerable number of the most significant collections of criticism published in the 20th century consisted in large part of newspaper reviews. To read such books today is to marvel at the fact that their learned contents were once deemed suitable for publication in general-circulation dailies.

  We are even farther removed from the unfocused newspaper reviews published in England between the turn of the 20th century and the eve of World War II, at a time when newsprint was dirt-cheap and stylish arts criticism was considered an ornament to the publications in which it appeared. In those far-off days, it was taken for granted that the critics of major papers would write in detail and at length about the events they covered. Theirs was a serious business, and even those reviewers who wore their learning lightly, like George Bernard Shaw and Ernest Newman, could be trusted to know what they were about. These men believed in journalism as a calling, and were proud to be published in the daily press. “So few authors have brains enough or literary gift enough to keep their own end up in journalism,” Newman wrote, “that I am tempted to define ‘journalism’ as ‘a term of contempt applied by writers who are not read to writers who are.’”

  Unfortunately, these critics are virtually forgotten. Neville Cardus, who wrote for the Manchester Guardian from 1917 until shortly before his death in 1975, is now known solely as a writer of essays on the game of cricket. During his lifetime, though, he was also one of England’s foremost classical-music critics, a stylist so widely admired that his Autobiography (1947) became a best-seller. He was knighted in 1967, the first music critic to be so honored. Yet only one of his books is now in print, and his vast body of writings on music is unknown save to specialists.

  Is there any chance that Cardus’s criticism will enjoy a revival? The prospect seems remote. Journalistic tastes had changed long before his death, and postmodern readers have little use for the richly upholstered Vicwardian prose in which he specialized. Moreover, the amateur tradition in music criticism has been in headlong retreat.

  21. It is indicated in Paragraphs 1 and 2 that

  [A] arts criticism has disappeared from big-city newspapers.

  [B] English-language newspapers used to carry more arts reviews.

  [C] high-quality newspapers retain a large body of readers.

  [D] young readers doubt the suitability of criticism on dailies.

  22. Newspaper reviews in England before World War II were characterized by

  [A] free themes. [B] casual style. [C] elaborate layout. [D] radical viewpoints.

  23. Which of the following would Shaw and Newman most probably agree on?

  [A] It is writers' duty to fulfill journalistic goals

  [B] It is contemptible for writers to be journalists.

  [C] Writers are likely to be tempted into journalism.

  [D] Not all writers are capable of journalistic writing.

  24. What can be learned about Cardus according to the last two paragraphs?

  [A] His music criticism may not appeal to readers today.

  [B] His reputation as a music critic has long been in dispute.

  [C] His style caters largely to modern specialists.

  [D] His writings fail to follow the amateur tradition.

  25. What would be the best title for the text?

  [A] Newspapers of the Good Old Days [B] The Lost Horizon in Newspapers

  [C] Mournful Decline of Journalism [D] Prominent Critics in Memory

  2010年英语一试题Text 4

  Bankers have been blaming themselves for their troubles in public. Behind the scenes, they have been taking aim at someone else: the accounting standard-setters. Their rules, moan the banks, have forced them to report enormous losses, and it's just not fair. These rules say they must value some assets at the price a third party would pay, not the price managers and regulators would like them to fetch.

  Unfortunately, banks' lobbying now seems to be working. The details may be unknowable, but the independence of standard-setters, essential to the proper functioning of capital markets, is being compromised. And, unless banks carry toxic assets at prices that attract buyers, reviving the banking system will be difficult.

  After a bruising encounter with Congress, America's Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) rushed through rule changes. These gave banks more freedom to use models to value illiquid assets and more flexibility in recognizing losses on long-term assets in their income statement. Bob Herz, the FASB's chairman, cried out against those who "question our motives." Yet bank shares rose and the changes enhance what one lobby group politely calls "the use of judgment by management."

  European ministers instantly demanded that the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) do likewise. The IASB says it does not want to act without overall planning, but the pressure to fold when it completes it reconstruction of rules later this year is strong. Charlie McCreevy, a European commissioner, warned the IASB that it did "not live in a political vacuum" but "in the real word" and that Europe could yet develop different rules.

  It was banks that were on the wrong planet, with accounts that vastly overvalued assets. Today they argue that market prices overstate losses, because they largely reflect the temporary illiquidity of markets, not the likely extent of bad debts. The truth will not be known for years. But bank's shares trade below their book value, suggesting that investors are skeptical. And dead markets partly reflect the paralysis of banks which will not sell assets for fear of booking losses, yet are reluctant to buy all those supposed bargains.

  To get the system working again, losses must be recognized and dealt with. America's new plan to buy up toxic assets will not work unless banks mark assets to levels which buyers find attractive. Successful markets require independent and even combative standard-setters. The FASB and IASB have been exactly that, cleaning up rules on stock options and pensions, for example, against hostility from special interests. But by giving in to critics now they are inviting pressure to make more concessions.

  36. Bankers complained that they were forced to

  [A] follow unfavorable asset evaluation rules [B] collect payments from third parties

  [C] cooperate with the price managers [D] reevaluate some of their assets.

  37. According to the author , the rule changes of the FASB may result in

  [A] the diminishing role of management [B] the revival of the banking system

  [C] the banks' long-term asset losses [D] the weakening of its independence

  38. According to Paragraph 4, McCreevy objects to the IASB's attempt to

  [A] keep away from political influences. [B] evade the pressure from their peers.

  [C] act on their own in rule-setting. [D] take gradual measures in reform.

  39. The author thinks the banks were "on the wrong planet" in that they

  [A] misinterpreted market price indicators

  [B] exaggerated the real value of their assets

  [C] neglected the likely existence of bad debts.

  [D] denied booking losses in their sale of assets.

  40. The author's attitude towards standard-setters is one of

  [A] satisfaction. [B] skepticism. [C] objectiveness [D] sympathy

  2011年英语一试题Text 4

  It’s no surprise that Jennifer Senior’s insightful, provocative magazine cover story, “I love My Children, I Hate My Life,” is arousing much chatter – nothing gets people talking like the suggestion that child rearing is anything less than a completely fulfilling, life-enriching experience. Rather than concluding that children make parents either happy or miserable, Senior suggests we need to redefine happiness: instead of thinking of it as something that can be measured by moment-to-moment joy, we should consider being happy as a past-tense condition. Even though the day-to-day experience of raising kids can be soul-crushingly hard, Senior writes that “the very things that in the moment dampen our moods can later be sources of intense gratification and delight.”

  The magazine cover showing an attractive mother holding a cute baby is hardly the only Madonna-and-child image on newsstands this week. There are also stories about newly adoptive – and newly single – mom Sandra Bullock, as well as the usual “Jennifer Aniston is pregnant” news. Practically every week features at least one celebrity mom, or mom-to-be, smiling on the newsstands.

  In a society that so persistently celebrates procreation, is it any wonder that admitting you regret having children is equivalent to admitting you support kitten-killing ? It doesn’t seem quite fair, then, to compare the regrets of parents to the regrets of the children. Unhappy parents rarely are provoked to wonder if they shouldn’t have had kids, but unhappy childless folks are bothered with the message that children are the single most important thing in the world: obviously their misery must be a direct result of the gaping baby-size holes in their lives.

  Of course, the image of parenthood that celebrity magazines like Us Weekly and People present is hugely unrealistic, especially when the parents are single mothers like Bullock. According to several studies concluding that parents are less happy than childless couples, single parents are the least happy of all. No shock there, considering how much work it is to raise a kid without a partner to lean on; yet to hear Sandra and Britney tell it, raising a kid on their “own” (read: with round-the-clock help) is a piece of cake.

  It’s hard to imagine that many people are dumb enough to want children just because Reese and Angelina make it look so glamorous: most adults understand that a baby is not a haircut. But it’s interesting to wonder if the images we see every week of stress-free, happiness-enhancing parenthood aren’t in some small, subconscious way contributing to our own dissatisfactions with the actual experience, in the same way that a small part of us hoped getting “ the Rachel” might make us look just a little bit like Jennifer Aniston.

  36.Jennifer Senior suggests in her article that raising a child can bring

  [A]temporary delight

  [B]enjoyment in progress

  [C]happiness in retrospect

  [D]lasting reward

  37.We learn from Paragraph 2 that

  [A]celebrity moms are a permanent source for gossip.

  [B]single mothers with babies deserve greater attention.

  [C]news about pregnant celebrities is entertaining.

  [D]having children is highly valued by the public.

  38.It is suggested in Paragraph 3 that childless folks

  [A]are constantly exposed to criticism.

  [B]are largely ignored by the media.

  [C]fail to fulfill their social responsibilities.

  [D]are less likely to be satisfied with their life.

  39.According to Paragraph 4, the message conveyed by celebrity magazines is

  [A]soothing.

  [B]ambiguous.

  [C]compensatory.

  [D]misleading.

  40.Which of the following can be inferred from the last paragraph?

  [A]Having children contributes little to the glamour of celebrity moms.

  [B]Celebrity moms have influenced our attitude towards child rearing.

  [C]Having children intensifies our dissatisfaction with life.

  [D]We sometimes neglect the happiness from child rearing.

  2012年英语一试题Text 3

  Text 3

  In the idealized version of how science is done, facts about the world are waiting to be observed and collected by objective researchers who use the scientific method to carry out their work. But in the everyday practice of science, discovery frequently follows an ambiguous and complicated route. We aim to be objective, but we cannot escape the context of our unique life experience. Prior knowledge and interest influence what we experience, what we think our experiences mean, and the subsequent actions we take. Opportunities for misinterpretation, error, and self-deception abound.

  Consequently, discovery claims should be thought of as protoscience. Similar to newly staked mining claims, they are full of potential. But it takes collective scrutiny and acceptance to transform a discovery claim into a mature discovery. This is the credibility process, through which the individual researcher’s me, here, now becomes the community’s anyone, anywhere, anytime. Objective knowledge is the goal, not the starting point.

  Once a discovery claim becomes public, the discoverer receives intellectual credit. But, unlike with mining claims, the community takes control of what happens next. Within the complex social structure of the scientific community, researchers make discoveries; editors and reviewers act as gatekeepers by controlling the publication process; other scientists use the new finding to suit their own purposes; and finally, the public (including other scientists) receives the new discovery and possibly accompanying technology. As a discovery claim works it through the community, the interaction and confrontation between shared and competing beliefs about the science and the technology involved transforms an individual’s discovery claim into the community’s credible discovery.

  Two paradoxes exist throughout this credibility process. First, scientific work tends to focus on some aspect of prevailing Knowledge that is viewed as incomplete or incorrect. Little reward accompanies duplication and confirmation of what is already known and believed. The goal is new-search, not re-search. Not surprisingly, newly published discovery claims and credible discoveries that appear to be important and convincing will always be open to challenge and potential modification or refutation by future researchers. Second, novelty itself frequently provokes disbelief. Nobel Laureate and physiologist Albert Azent-Gyorgyi once described discovery as “seeing what everybody has seen and thinking what nobody has thought.” But thinking what nobody else has thought and telling others what they have missed may not change their views. Sometimes years are required for truly novel discovery claims to be accepted and appreciated.

  In the end, credibility “happens” to a discovery claim – a process that corresponds to what philosopher Annette Baier has described as the commons of the mind. “We reason together, challenge, revise, and complete each other’s reasoning and each other’s conceptions of reason.”

  31. According to the first paragraph, the process of discovery is characterized by its

  [A] uncertainty and complexity.

  [B] misconception and deceptiveness.

  [C] logicality and objectivity.

  [D] systematicness and regularity.

  32. It can be inferred from Paragraph 2 that credibility process requires

  [A] strict inspection.

  [B]shared efforts.

  [C] individual wisdom.

  [D]persistent innovation.

  33.Paragraph 3 shows that a discovery claim becomes credible after it

  [A] has attracted the attention of the general public.

  [B]has been examined by the scientific community.

  [C] has received recognition from editors and reviewers.

  [D]has been frequently quoted by peer scientists.

  34. Albert Szent-Györgyi would most likely agree that

  [A] scientific claims will survive challenges.

  [B]discoveries today inspire future research.

  [C] efforts to make discoveries are justified.

  [D]scientific work calls for a critical mind.

  35.Which of the following would be the best title of the test?

  [A] Novelty as an Engine of Scientific Development.

  [B]Collective Scrutiny in Scientific Discovery.

  [C] Evolution of Credibility in Doing Science.

  [D]Challenge to Credibility at the Gate to Science.

  答案参考

  21. B 22. C 23. D 24. A 25. A

  36.A 37. D 38. C 39. B 40. A

  36.C 37.D 38.A 39.D 40.B

  31.A 32.D 33.B 34.D 35.D

  今天小编给大家分享了2018考研英语阅读须精读的4篇试题阅读,希望对大家有帮助。另外,中公考研提醒大家2018考研招生简章2018考研招生目录2018考研参考书目以及2018考研大纲已经出来。另外,为了帮助考生更好地复习,中公考研为广大学子推出2018考研VIP1对1秋季集训营推免课程系列备考专题,针对每一个科目要点进行深入的指导分析,还会根据每年的考研大纲进行针对性的分析哦~欢迎各位考生了 解咨询。同时,中公考研一直为大家推出考研直播课堂,足不出户就可以边听课边学习,为大家的考研梦想助力!

  相关推荐:

  20年考研英语研究生入学考试试题 试题集锦!

  2018考研英语大纲已发布,写作如何拿分?

  2018考研英语大纲已发布,作文效备考用6大策略

  2018考研英语9/10月份复习计划及重点

  2018考研英语9月复习重点及建议

  2018考研英语复习大指导(超详尽篇)

  2018考研英语:艺术生及在职考生如何过线?

  经验教你如何三个月记忆四千考研英语单词

精华推荐:

VIP1对1

秋季集训营

考研常见问题

各大院校历年报录比

择校择专业指南

各大院校招简|目录|书目

考研历年复试分数线

奖助学金政策解读

考研历年试题库

专科生考研备考指南

跨专业考研热门专业详解

推免攻略|推免课程

   

欢迎关注(中公教育考研频道)
及时掌握考研信息

微信咨询 回复“2021”领取备考大礼包
THE END  

声明:本站点发布的来源标注为“中公教育”的文章,版权均属中公教育所有,未经允许不得转载。

如果对你有帮助的话,就点个赞吧!

 猜你喜欢换一换  

 直播课堂

22考研-复试综合面试备考指导讲座

山东22考研-复试综合面试备考指导讲座

考研 |02-25 07:00

免费
2022陕西省考——行之有效,1课堂(直播版)

陕西中公陪你等公告-笔试倒计时34天,盘点省考考查热点

省考 |02-20 07:00

免费
2022省考政在发生——聚焦当今中国(直播版)

陕西中公陪你等公告-笔试倒计时34天,盘点省考考查热点

省考 |02-20 07:00

免费
2022年陕西公务员考试-百日冲刺迎省考

陕西中公陪你等公告-笔试倒计时34天,盘点省考考查热点

省考 |02-20 07:00

免费

 图书教材去APP查看更多图书

备考工具
退出

考研<

进入频道首页

考研信息

招生简章 考研政策 考试指南 就业信息 考试动态 招生目录 考研院校 考研大纲 参考书目 报录比 成绩查询入口 考研复试 分数线 考研调剂 录取通知书 推免生

备考资料

考研数学 考研政治 考研英语 联考综合 考研专业课 考研专硕 考研常识 复试资料 备考手册

考试题库

考研数学 考研政治 考研英语 联考综合

企业新闻

最新活动

热门话题

精彩专题

各项目入口一键直达<

国家公务员

地方公务员

北京公务员

山东公务员

浙江公务员

江苏公务员

湖南公务员

辽宁公务员

吉林公务员

黑龙江公务员

上海公务员

四川公务员

广东公务员

天津公务员

云南公务员

湖北公务员

河南公务员

福建公务员

安徽公务员

河北公务员

重庆公务员

江西公务员

陕西公务员

贵州公务员

青海公务员

内蒙古公务员

宁夏公务员

新疆公务员

广西公务员

甘肃公务员

山西公务员

海南公务员

西藏公务员

事业单位招聘

公选/遴选考试

大学生村官

军人考试

教师考试

警法考试

选调生

三支一扶

农村信用社

申论热点

银行考试

医学考试

会计考试

在职硕士

医疗卫生招聘

社区工作者

考研

中公新闻

时事政治

行测

面试

申论

公益性岗位

国企招聘

乡镇公务员

防诈骗技巧

公基常识

一级消防工程师

投资者关系网站

公考问答

社会工作师

四六级

法考

软考

PMP

建设工程

IT培训

外语培训